Learn more about this area code and exchange and where the caller may be located.
The phone exchange is the three digits after the area code and before the extension. An example is (563) 202-XXXX where 202 is the exchange number. It enables telephone line extensions to be interconnected in a local area based on a specific geographic assignment.
The (563) 202 exchange is located within the 563 area code in Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA. It connects landline numbers from the Verizon Wireless carrier in Winneshiek county. Associated zip codes include 52101.
Potentially, callers could keep their phone numbers even if they move away, so a caller may be located in Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA or elsewhere. You can use a reverse phone lookup to help find the registered address for a potential caller.
(563) 202-1011
Random text “Hey there, is this (my name)?” No reply to my reply trying to figure out who it was
(563) 202-6358
Phone stated potential spam
(563) 202-6323
Phone stated potential spam
(563) 202-0382
silly
(563) 202-7460
This number text me to buy my house!!!! What the burnt hotdog!!! Beware
(563) 202-2480
Is it legit business
(563) 202-5228
this number texted my boyfriend **** photo’s trying to get him to send photos back i think this number is a spam/s****/whatever
(563) 202-5155
******
(563) 202-8552
Spam I believe
(563) 202-2200
Text about selling masks
(563) 202-7735
I believe this is a spoof number my fiance and her ex used to chat one night and Everytime they chat it's a new different number. How can I tell?
(563) 202-5012
Check http://www.800notes.com where there are multiple comments about this number 503-202-5012. Comments say calls from this number are "legal action" and "immediate arrest" threats unless they receive money from person called. I get calls almost every morning with the Caller ID "Out of Area." They are always totally anonymous when checked with Beenverified. No information. Not even phone company. The phone numbers change from call to call. This is legal threat scam. Probably multiple scams with anonymous phone company carriers. Why do phone company carriers cooperate with anonymity feature requested by customers, especially anonymity of the phone company carrier? Why isn't there government legislation by Congress to regulate anonymity, including checking phone numbers with granted anonymity to see what they are up to, justified by established suspicions of scam when this anonymity feature requested and granted by phone company carriers? The majority party now in power in both the House of Representatives and the Senate are not doing anything else important during the present administration. Write to your congressmen and senators. They all have web sites where you can contribute suggestions, information, comments, etc., online. If they don't, maybe that should be a suggestion either by phone or letter. Anyway, it is a good policy to not answer numbers showing anonymous Caller IDs such as "Out of Area" and "Unknown Name" or just "Unknown." They often ring for a long time because that is successful for them, as it wears down many call recipients who finally pick up. Don't do it. There is always a reason for anonymity and usually it is not good. Better still write down the caller number or use *69 to find out what number just called you. Best, if you know how, to block the number (though these scam callers have endless often randomly generated phone numbers granted by cooperating phone company carriers who just want to increase their bottom line profits, even at the expense of gullible threatened victims who are their honest customers.
(563) 202-5013
Says you will be taken into custody by “local cops”.
(563) 202-2002
Called no message
(563) 202-6010
Robot call from vehicle warranty company