Owner's Name
Address: 123 Example Address, New York, NY, 10001
Peerless Network
Orange
VOIP
92856, 92857, 92859, 92861
Orange, CA
33° 47' 13.24", -117° 51' 8.66"
Affiliated with Peerless Network, the Landline line (714) 509-1298 traces back to Orange, CA, or close by. It has been looked up 12 times total. There's a record of 1 comments for this number, with the most recent note received on. Up to now, its spam score registers at 10%. Further in-depth facts are listed below.
Want to learn more? Check the (714) 509-1298 FAQ
Potential SPAM / Scam Caller Please use caution!
User Score
Spam Score
10% Spam Risk
Leaked
Not Leaked
Search Volume
High
12 Searches
by our users
Nuisance Call Scan
Medium Risk
1 Complaint
by our users
VoIP Number
Yes, Use Caution
Recent Abuse
No
Risk Level
Risky
This number has been reported as spam 1 times, has been searched 12 times, and has garnered 1 comment by our users. These numbers are higher than average, indicating a possible high risk of spam.
Discover key indicators that may help verify a phone number’s legitimacy.
FraudScan Score
85%
Fraud Risk
Legitimate User Activity
None
Likely fraudulent or a new number
Valid Number
Yes
Prepaid Number
No
Active Status
Active
Do not Call Status
Not On DNC List
More information for this phone number available
View Full Report
A phone number may have multiple owners due to a shared/family plan, or a transferral of ownership
Learn more about this phone number and where the caller may be located.
Area code 714, known for its vibrant demographic mix, encompasses parts of Los Angeles and Orange Counties. According to public data sources, it has a population of approximately 13 million, exhibiting a rich cultural diversity with about 49% identifying as White and around 19% as Asian. The area's economic trends reveal a labor force participation rate hovering around 65%, with unemployment rates showing a notable improvement over the past decade—dropping from nearly 10% to about 6%.
FCC complaint metrics within the 714 area code illustrate distinct changes over time. Communication patterns show wireless complaints peaked in 2017, while wired complaints diminished notably post-2015. Prerecorded and live voice complaints saw their highest levels around 2015, but there has been a clear decline since, particularly through 2023. Unwanted calls and telemarketing complaints surged in the mid-2010s, reaching their zenith in 2017, but have consistently decreased, with current numbers suggesting effective mitigation efforts. Text message complaints peaked in 2020, yet have since waned, indicating shifts in consumer communication concerns.
AI Disclaimer: This content was generated by artificial intelligence (AI) based on publicly available government data. While we strive for accuracy, the data may be out of date and/or subject to change
Phone Number | Carrier | Location | View Details |
---|---|---|---|
(714) 707-3350 | Verizon Wireless | Silverado, CA | View Reports |
(714) 453-9292 | Mpower | Orange, CA | View Reports |
(714) 539-6684 | AT&T California | Garden Grove, CA | View Reports |
(714) 450-3875 | T-Mobile | Orange, CA | View Reports |
(714) 204-3114 | DMR Communications | Anaheim, CA | View Reports |
(714) 509-1298
“ Communications owned now by Windstream Communications provides VoiP phone services. They sell these services to scammers who use their VoiP lines to call consumers in violation of the national do not call list. These scammers attempt to BS consumers out of credit card, bank account, and SSN info. The scammers use a variety of ruses such as a "free alarm sign in your yard and free alarm system", etc. While I've not been taken in by any of these scammers - my complaint is that Paetec is aware these companies are committing fraud and violations of Federal law and they do not respond to any complaints made to them about the fact their customers are doing this. They are providing the means for theft and they are aware of it and yet they choose to do nothing. Case in point a phone # 718-732-1022 which is owned by Paetec but being used by a bunch of scammers overseas. Paetec has been informed of this and has chosen to take no action.”